Statement on Senate Bill No. 915 / House Bill No. 1072, & Senate Bill No. 868/ House Bill No. 1130.
Statement by the Board of the Memphis Bar Association
As representatives of the Memphis Bar Association, we have a distinct interest in preserving the independence of the judiciary, access to the courts, and the rule of law. SB915/HB1072 jeopardizes all three.
By providing an automatic interlocutory appeal, and stay pending final outcome of the appeal, of any trial court order granting any sort of relief in a constitutional challenge to a state statute, this bill takes away an essential type of discretion from the co-equal judicial branch. This includes the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and the Tennessee Supreme Court, all of whom currently have discretion on such decisions. This provision raises serious concerns about the separation of powers and the bill's constitutionality.
This provision also threatens individual liberty. There are many cases where the matter being litigated is time-sensitive, and the implementation of an unconstitutional statute can cause immediate and irrevocable violations of constitutional rights. Giving the state an automatic stay pending the sometimes-lengthy appellate process would allow such violations to move forward, rendering the eventual appellate review moot. Rather than giving the State a blanket pass pending appeal, such matters are best left to the sound discretion of the judiciary on a case-by-case basis.
The bill also permanently bars any local government entity from ever challenging the constitutionality of a state statute. This also encroaches on judicial independence and threatens constitutional rights, by depriving state statutes of a key source of judicial review. There are sometimes cases where only a local government entity may have standing to challenge a state statute, or where the standing of other litigants is more open to question and thus expensive and time-consuming motion practice. There are other situations where only local government entities have the resources to challenge unconstitutional laws.
All of the above provisions add up to an attempt by the legislative branch to insulate itself from meaningful judicial scrutiny. If it passes, the judicial branch will be weaker, as will Tennesseans' protection against unconstitutional laws.
We respectfully urge the General Assembly to reject this bill.
Such an entirely new group of judges is both unnecessary and also an inefficient allocation of judicial resources, because constitutional challenges to state action represent only a very tiny fraction of the overall statewide caseload.
For the above reasons, we urge the General Assembly to reject this bill as well.
Contact: Steve Mulroy 901-603-877
Please note: Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser. We recommend using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox or Safari for best results. If you're having trouble logging in to register for a CLE or review your membership information, let us know before creating a new account. Click here for assistance.